When it comes to smoothing fine lines and wrinkles, neurotoxins like Dysport and Botox are two of the most popular options. Both are derived from botulinum toxin type A and work by temporarily relaxing the muscles responsible for dynamic wrinkles, such as crow’s feet and frown lines. However, despite their similarities, there are key differences that may make one a better choice for you than the other.
In this article, we’ll explore both Dysport and Botox to help you determine which treatment aligns best with your aesthetic goals.
What’s the Difference Between Dysport and Botox?
Before diving into the pros and cons of Dysport vs Botox, it’s important to understand their main distinctions:
Formula Differences: Dysport has smaller molecules, which may allow it to spread more easily in larger treatment areas. Botox, on the other hand, has a more concentrated formula, leading to precise, targeted application.
Onset Time: Dysport tends to take effect a little faster (2-3 days), while Botox may take 3-5 days for visible results.
Longevity: Both last 3-4 months, depending on individual metabolism, treatment area, and dosage.
Price & Units: When comparing neurotoxin treatments, you might notice that the units are measured differently depending on the brand. While the units vary, the total volume of product used typically remains the same. Because of these different measurement systems, pricing per unit may differ, but the total cost of treatment is generally comparable across brands, including Botox and Dysport. This ensures you’re receiving the same high-quality results, no matter which option you choose.
Now, let’s break down the pros and cons of each option.
Pros and Cons of Dysport
Pros of Dysport:
-
Faster Onset – Results can be noticeable in 2-3 days, making it a great choice for those needing quick results.
-
Smoother Spread – Due to its formulation, Dysport spreads more easily, which can be beneficial for treating larger areas like the forehead.
-
More Natural Look for Some Areas – Because of its diffusion properties, Dysport may create a softer, more blended appearance in areas with multiple small wrinkles.
Cons of Dysport:
-
Higher Unit Requirement – Since Dysport’s units are measured differently than Botox, treatments often require more units, making direct cost comparisons tricky.
Pros and Cons of Botox
Pros of Botox:
-
Highly Precise Application – Botox is ideal for smaller areas like crow’s feet, lip lines, and brow lifts due to its more localized action.
-
Well-Known & Widely Studied – Botox has been on the market longer and has an extensive track record of safety and effectiveness.
-
Predictable & Consistent Results – Many patients find that Botox provides a more consistent outcome.
Cons of Botox:
-
Slightly Slower Onset – Results typically appear within 3-5 days, which may be a consideration if you're looking for immediate results.
Dysport vs Botox: Which One Is Right for You?
The choice between Dysport vs Botox depends on several factors:
-
If you want faster results, Dysport may be the better choice.
-
If you need precision in small areas, Botox is often preferred.
-
If you’re treating a larger area, Dysport’s spreading effect can provide a smooth, natural result.
The best way to decide is by consulting with one of our expert injectors who can assess your individual concerns, muscle strength, and aesthetic goals.
At OVME, our experienced team specializes in both Botox and Dysport and will tailor a treatment plan to help you achieve the best results. Book a consultation today to see which option is right for you!